Página inicial
/
Matemática
/

Question

40. (1 pt) In 2022, Mexico had a total ecological footprint of 2.3gha/person
and a total biocapacity of 1.2
gha/per person. In that year how many times higher was their per capita footprint compared to their p
capita biocapacity? Show your work, round to 1 decimal places, and include the unit (x higher) in your
answer.
41. (1 pt) Fill in the blank: In 2022, Mexico was harvesting underline ( )%  % more of their country's raw materi
was sustainable. Show your work, round to 1 decimal places, and put your answer into the blank spac
include the unit (%)in your answer.

40. (1 pt) In 2022, Mexico had a total ecological footprint of 2.3gha/person and a total biocapacity of 1.2 gha/per person. In that year how many times higher was their per capita footprint compared to their p capita biocapacity? Show your work, round to 1 decimal places, and include the unit (x higher) in your answer. 41. (1 pt) Fill in the blank: In 2022, Mexico was harvesting underline ( )% % more of their country's raw materi was sustainable. Show your work, round to 1 decimal places, and put your answer into the blank spac include the unit (%)in your answer.

Solution

expert verified Verificación de expertos
4.4 (305 Votos)
avatar
Claudio Profissional · Tutor por 6 anos

Resposta

40. Para determinar cuántas veces mayor fue la huella ecológica per cápita de México en comparación con su biocapacidad per cápita en 2022, utilizamos la siguiente fórmula: Sustituyendo los valores proporcionados: Realizamos la división: Redondeando a un decimal: Por lo tanto, la huella ecológica per cápita de México fue aproximadamente 1.9 veces mayor que su biocapacidad per cápita en 2022.41. Para determinar el porcentaje adicional de materias primas que México estaba cosechando en comparación con lo que era sostenible, utilizamos la siguiente fórmula: Sustituyendo los valores proporcionados: Realizamos las operaciones dentro del paréntesis: Dividimos y multiplicamos por 100: Redondeando a un decimal: Por lo tanto, en 2022, México estaba cosechando aproximadamente un 91.7% más de materias primas de su país de lo que era sostenible.