Question
Read the passage from Sugar Changed the World. The seeds for this system were sown in 1823 in the sugar colony of British Guiana-now Guyana-where John Gladstone, father of the future British prime minister William Gladstone, owned over a thousand slaves. John Smith, a young and idealistic English preacher who had recently come to the area was becoming popular with those slaves. His inspiring sermons retold the story of Moses leading the Jews out of Egypt and to freedom. The sugar workers listened and understood: Smith was speaking not about the Bible, but about the present. That summer, after hearing one of Smith's sermons, over three thousand slaves grabbed their machetes, their long poles, and rose up against their masters. The governor of the colony rushed toward the burning plantations, where he met a group of armed slaves. and asked them what they wanted. The evidence of enslaved people's revolt and fight for freedom is anecdotal, because it tells a narrative about enslaved people taking action for basic human rights. logical, because it tells why enslaved people were justified in using violence to gain freedom. empirical, because it provides research to show that enslaved people's actions were effective. logical, because it provides facts to support the conclusion that violence was the best option.
Solution
4.4
(232 Votos)
Leonardo
Profissional · Tutor por 6 anos
Resposta
The evidence of enslaved people's revolt and fight for freedom is anecdotal, because it tells a narrative about enslaved people taking action for basic human rights.
Explicação
## Step 1The problem is asking us to identify the type of evidence used in the given passage. The options are anecdotal, logical, empirical, and logical. ## Step 2The passage describes a historical event where slaves revolted against their masters. This is a narrative or story, which is a characteristic of anecdotal evidence. ## Step 3The passage does not provide any logical reasoning or empirical data to support the conclusion that violence was the best option. Therefore, the evidence is not logical or empirical.