is a legal standard of proof E-in United States law E-that is less than probable cause E, the legal standard for arrests B and warrants E,, but more than an "inchoate and unparticularized suspicion or "hunch";I1] B it must be based on "specific and articulable facts", "taken together with rational inferences from those facts",{2] E and the suspicion must be associated with the specific individual. Consensual Encounter Probable Cause Exigent circumstances Reasonable Suspicion

Question

is a legal standard of proof E-in United States law E-that is less than probable cause E, the legal standard for arrests B and warrants E,, but more than an "inchoate and unparticularized suspicion or "hunch";I1] B it must be based on "specific and articulable facts", "taken together with rational inferences from those facts",{2] E and the suspicion must be associated with the specific individual. Consensual Encounter Probable Cause Exigent circumstances Reasonable Suspicion

Answer 1

The legal standard of proof you are describing is "Reasonable Suspicion." In United States law, reasonable suspicion is a standard used in criminal procedure. It is less than probable cause but more than just a hunch. It requires specific and articulable facts, along with rational inferences from those facts, that would lead a reasonable person to suspect that a crime has been, is being, or will be committed. This standard is often used by law enforcement officers to justify brief stops and detentions, such as a stop-and-frisk.

Question

Solution

Resposta