Question
a. How are Grice's Maxims of Cooperation used to generate implicatures? (11 Marks) b. Analyze the LOCUTION ILLOCUTION, PERLOCUTION of the following utterances. (i.) There's a fly in soup. (3 Marks) (ii.) I'll be back for you (3 Marks) (iii.) I have a gun. (3 Marks) 5.What is the relation between indirect speech acts (Searle, 1975)and Brown and Levinson's Politeness Theory? (20 Marks)
Solution
4.4
(302 Votos)
Adelaide
Profissional · Tutor por 6 anos
Resposta
a. Grice's Maxims of Cooperation are used to generate implicatures by providing a framework for understanding the intended meaning behind a speaker's utterance. The maxims include the Maxim of Quantity, Maxim of Quality, Maxim of Relation, and Maxim of Manner. By adhering to these maxims, speakers can convey implicatures that go beyond the literal meaning of their words.b. (i.) "There's a fly in soup." - LOCUTION: The utterance is a straightforward statement. ILLOCUTION: The speaker is informing the listener about the presence of a fly in the soup. PERLOCUTION: The speaker may intend to prompt the listener to take action, such as removing the fly.(ii.) "I'll be back for you." - LOCUTION: The utterance is a declarative statement. ILLOCUTION: The speaker is making a promise or expressing a commitment to return for the listener. PERLOCUTION: The speaker may intend to reassure the listener or express their intention to return.(iii.) "I have a gun." - LOCUTION: The utterance is a simple statement. ILLOCUTION: The speaker is providing information about possessing a gun. PERLOCUTION: The speaker may intend to convey a sense of power or threat, depending on the context and tone of delivery.5. The relation between indirect speech acts (Searle, 1975) and Brown and Levinson's Politeness Theory lies in the way they both address the social aspects of communication. Indirect speech acts, as proposed by Searle, involve conveying a meaning that is different from the literal interpretation of the words used. Brown and Levinson's Politeness Theory, on the other hand, focuses on the strategies individuals use to maintain social harmony and avoid causing offense in communication. Both theories recognize the importance of considering the social context and the relationship between the speaker and the listener in shaping the meaning and effectiveness of communication.