What is one difference in how Carmichpel approaches the universal theme of connections to the natural world in "An Old Bush Road" compared to how Johnson does in "Joe"? Carmichael shows that nature will only benefit from colonization, and Johnson shows that nature will be completely eliminated by the colonization of the land. Carmichael shows that nature is resilient, while Johnson shows that nature has merged with colonization. Carmichael suggests that only people who were born in rural areas can have a connection with that land, while Johnson feels anyone can be inspired by any natural landscape Johnson argues the opposite. Carmichael shows that it is impossible for someone to be connected to nature in the modern world, while

Question

What is one difference in how Carmichpel approaches the universal theme of connections to the natural world in "An Old Bush Road" compared to how Johnson does in "Joe"? Carmichael shows that nature will only benefit from colonization, and Johnson shows that nature will be completely eliminated by the colonization of the land. Carmichael shows that nature is resilient, while Johnson shows that nature has merged with colonization. Carmichael suggests that only people who were born in rural areas can have a connection with that land, while Johnson feels anyone can be inspired by any natural landscape Johnson argues the opposite. Carmichael shows that it is impossible for someone to be connected to nature in the modern world, while

Answer 1

Carmichael suggests that only people who were born in rural areas can have a connection with that land, while Johnson feels anyone can be inspired by any natural landscape.This difference highlights how Carmichael emphasizes a more personal and intrinsic connection to the land based on one's origins, whereas Johnson presents a more inclusive view where the natural world can inspire and connect with anyone, regardless of their background or birthplace.

Question

Solution

Resposta