1. What is the Principle of Alternate Possibilities? 2. Why is Jones4 still morally responsible for his actions? 3. What change does Frankfurt suggest we make to the Principle of Alternate Possibilities?

1. The Principle of Alternate Possibilities (PAP) is a philosophical concept that states that a person is morally responsible for what they have done only if they could have done otherwise. In other words, for an individual to be held morally accountable for their actions, they must have had the ability to choose differently in a given situation.

2. According to Harry Frankfurt's theory of moral responsibility, Jones4 would still be morally responsible for his actions even if he did not have the ability to do otherwise. Frankfurt argues that moral responsibility does not necessarily require the ability to do otherwise. Instead, he suggests that moral responsibility is determined by the presence of certain psychological conditions, such as the individual's desire to act in a certain way and their belief that they are free to choose.

3. Frankfurt suggests that we modify the Principle of Alternate Possibilities by replacing the requirement of alternate possibilities with the presence of certain psychological conditions. According to Frankfurt, an individual is morally responsible for their actions if they have the desire to act in a certain way and believe they are free to choose, even if they do not have the ability to do otherwise. This modification to the PAP allows for the possibility that an individual can be held morally responsible for their actions even in situations where they do not have alternate possibilities.