What is one reason the author believes that appointments to the judicial branch should be treated differently from those in the legislative and executive branches? A. Judicial appointments should not be dependent on the will of the people. B. Voters are unlikely to be familiar with candidates for judicial appointments. C. Judicial appointments are less consequential than legislative and executive appointments. D. The qualifications needed for judicial appointments differ from those of the other branches.

Question

What is one reason the author believes that appointments to the judicial branch should be treated differently from those in the legislative and executive branches? A. Judicial appointments should not be dependent on the will of the people. B. Voters are unlikely to be familiar with candidates for judicial appointments. C. Judicial appointments are less consequential than legislative and executive appointments. D. The qualifications needed for judicial appointments differ from those of the other branches.

Answer 1

. Judicial appointments should not be dependent on the will of the people.The author believes that appointments to the judicial branch should be treated differently from those in the legislative and executive branches because judicial appointments should not be dependent on the will of the people. This is to ensure that judges can make decisions based on the law and justice, rather than being influenced by political pressures or popular opinion.

Question

Solution

Resposta