How does judicial review shape the relationship between the legislative and executive branches? By giving Congress the final authority on constitutional issues By ensuring acts of both branches adhere to constitutional principles By requiring allaws to be reviewed by the Supreme Court before implementation By limiting the executive's ability to issue executive orders

## Step 1<br />The concept of judicial review is a fundamental principle in the U.S. legal system. This principle allows the courts to examine and possibly invalidate laws and decisions made by the legislative and executive branches if they are found to be in violation of the Constitution.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />The judicial review process does not give Congress the final authority on constitutional issues. Instead, it allows the courts to interpret the Constitution and determine whether the legislative and executive actions are in line with it.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />The judicial review process does not require all laws to be reviewed by the Supreme Court before implementation. While the Supreme Court is the highest court in the U.S., it does not have the power to review all laws before they are implemented.<br /><br />## Step 4<br />The judicial review process does not limit the executive's ability to issue executive orders. While the courts can review executive orders to ensure they are constitutional, this does not limit the executive's ability to issue them.<br /><br />## Step 5<br />The judicial review process ensures that acts of both the legislative and executive branches adhere to constitutional principles. This is the primary function of judicial review, and it is the correct answer to the question.