2. The Ottoman Empire had little connection to the Triangle Trade. What assumption can be made from this statement? The Turks did not like to trade in slaves or with those who did. The Ottoman Empire suffered financial losses because of lost trade. The Triangle Trade had little influence on the Ottomans. The New World had little to offer to the Turks trading market.

## Step 1<br />The problem presents a statement about the Ottoman Empire's lack of connection to the Triangle Trade. The Triangle Trade refers to the trade route that connected Europe, Africa, and the Americas, primarily involving the slave trade. The Ottoman Empire, a historical empire located in modern-day Turkey, is said to have had little connection to this trade.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />The question asks us to make an assumption based on this statement. The options provided are:<br />A. The Turks did not like to trade in slaves or with those who did.<br />B. The Ottoman Empire suffered financial losses because of lost trade.<br />C. The Triangle Trade had little influence on the Ottomans.<br />D. The New World had little to offer to the Turks trading market.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />Option A is not a logical assumption because the statement does not provide any information about the Turks' preferences for trade. Option B is also not a logical assumption because the statement does not provide any information about the financial status of the Ottoman Empire. Option D is not a logical assumption because the statement does not provide any information about the New World's offerings to the Turks' trading market.<br /><br />## Step 4<br />Option C, "The Triangle Trade had little influence on the Ottomans," is the most logical assumption based on the statement. The statement directly says that the Ottoman Empire had little connection to the Triangle Trade, which implies that the Triangle Trade had little influence on the Ottomans.