(B) TEXT ANSWER Write a story of a fictional civil law case. Explain two arguments the plaintiff uses and two arguments the defense uses. Then, reveal the jury's decision about whether the defendant is guilty. Optional ideas you may use for your story include: Kanatani Studios America sues Ferdinand for selling T-shirts depicting a character for which Kanatani Studios America has intellectual property rights. Ferdinand claims the shirts show his original artwork. While at work, Monica uses a ladder in a warehouse, and the ladder slips and falls. Monica is injured and sues her employer, Star Solutions. Star Solutions claims Monica was using the ladder improperly. George sues Ruth after Ruth's car rear-ends George's car. Ruth claims George braked suddenly and caused the accident. Teresa sues her doctor Dr. Patterson, for prescribing a medicine that causes Teresa to lose her sense of smell.Dr. Patterson denies responsibility for the side effect.

In the case of Kanatani Studios America vs. Ferdinand, the plaintiff, Kanatani Studios America, argues that Ferdinand is infringing on their intellectual property rights by selling T-shirts depicting a character for which they hold the rights. They argue that the T-shirts are an unauthorized use of their copyrighted material and are causing them financial harm. Ferdinand, the defendant, argues that the T-shirts are an original work of art and that he has the right to use the character on the T-shirts. He claims that the character is not protected by copyright and that the T-shirts are not causing him any financial harm.<br /><br />In the case of Monica vs. Star Solutions, the plaintiff, Monica, argues that her employer, Star Solutions, was negligent in providing a safe working environment. She claims that the ladder she was using was defective and that the company should have known about the defect and fixed it. Star Solutions, the defendant, argues that Monica was using the ladder improperly and that the ladder was not defective. They claim that Monica was responsible for her own injuries and that the company is not at fault.<br /><br />In the case of George vs. Ruth, the plaintiff, George, argues that Ruth was negligent in operating her vehicle and that her actions caused the accident. He claims that Ruth was following too closely behind him and did not have enough time to react to his sudden braking. Ruth, the defendant, argues that George was the one who was negligent and that his sudden braking caused the accident. She claims that she was following a safe distance and that George should have seen her coming and braked earlier.<br /><br />In the case of Teresa vs. Dr. Patterson, the plaintiff, Teresa, argues that Dr. Patterson was negligent in prescribing a medication that caused her to lose her sense of smell. She claims that the doctor did not properly research the side effects of the medication and that he should have known about the potential for this side effect. Dr. Patterson, the defendant, argues that the side effect is rare and that he did not know it would happen in Teresa's case. He claims that he followed the proper protocols in prescribing the medication and that Teresa's reaction is not his fault.