Turnout in National Elections, 1992 - 2014' Based on the graph, which statement is most accurate? A. Voter apathy plays a greater role in presidential elections. B. Voter apathy does not affect the United States. C. Voter turnout has been steadily rising over the past 20 years. D. Voter turnout is especially low in midterm elections.

## Step 1: Analyze the Graph Data<br />### The graph shows two lines representing voter turnout in presidential and midterm elections from 1992 to 2014. The red line for presidential elections consistently shows higher turnout percentages, ranging between 50% to 60%. In contrast, the black line for midterm elections shows lower turnout, generally around 40% to 50%, with a noticeable decline over time, especially by 2014.<br /><br />## Step 2: Evaluate Each Statement<br />### - **Statement A:** "Voter apathy plays a greater role in presidential elections." This is inaccurate because the graph shows higher turnout during presidential elections compared to midterms.<br />### - **Statement B:** "Voter apathy does not affect the United States." This is incorrect as the graph indicates varying levels of turnout, suggesting some degree of voter apathy, particularly in midterm elections.<br />### - **Statement C:** "Voter turnout has been steadily rising over the past 20 years." This is false; the graph does not show a steady rise. Instead, it shows fluctuations with no clear upward trend.<br />### - **Statement D:** "Voter turnout is especially low in midterm elections." This statement is accurate as the graph clearly depicts lower turnout during midterm election years compared to presidential election years.