Read the following main idea, then select the statement that would NOT be a strong supporting point. The legal voting age in the U.S. should be lowered to 16. The voting age was lowered to 18 by the Twenty-Sixth Amendment in 1971. Research shows most people's long-term reasoning is fully developed by this age. Historically, including more voters has resulted in more popular and successful legislation being passed Teens who vote young become life-long voters.

## Step 1<br />The problem is asking us to identify the statement that would NOT be a strong supporting point for the main idea that the legal voting age in the U.S. should be lowered to 16. The main idea is the proposition that the voting age should be lowered, and the supporting points should provide reasons or evidence that support this proposition.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />The first statement talks about the historical context of the voting age being lowered to 18 by the Twenty-Sixth Amendment in 1971. This statement provides a historical context but does not directly support the proposition of lowering the voting age to 16.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />The second statement talks about research that shows most people's long-term reasoning is fully developed by the age of 16. This statement provides a reason that supports the proposition of lowering the voting age to 16.<br /><br />## Step 4<br />The third statement talks about the historical trend of more voters resulting in more popular and successful legislation being passed. This statement provides a reason that supports the proposition of lowering the voting age to 16.<br /><br />## Step 5<br />The fourth statement talks about the idea that teens who vote young become life-long voters. This statement provides a reason that supports the proposition of lowering the voting age to 16.