Primeira página
/
História
/
88 MULTIPLE CHOICE Question 3 What made the idea of "separate but equal"constitutional? There were no rules in the constitution to protect equality at the time, meaning that segregation did not viole the constitution. B Separate spaces were of "the same quality" and therefore a separation did not violate equal protection requirements e Separate spaces were of higher quality for those deemed worthy and therefore did not violate the rights of th that paid a higher price.

Pergunta

88 MULTIPLE CHOICE
Question 3
What made the idea of "separate but equal"constitutional?
There were no rules in the constitution to protect equality at the time, meaning that segregation did not viole
the constitution.
B Separate spaces were of "the same quality" and therefore a separation did not violate equal protection
requirements
e Separate spaces were of higher quality for those deemed worthy and therefore did not violate the rights of th
that paid a higher price.

88 MULTIPLE CHOICE Question 3 What made the idea of "separate but equal"constitutional? There were no rules in the constitution to protect equality at the time, meaning that segregation did not viole the constitution. B Separate spaces were of "the same quality" and therefore a separation did not violate equal protection requirements e Separate spaces were of higher quality for those deemed worthy and therefore did not violate the rights of th that paid a higher price.

Solução

expert verifiedVerification of experts
3.8228 Voting
avatar
AuroraProfissional · Tutor por 6 anos

Responder

B

Explicação

## Step 1<br />The problem is asking us to identify the reason that made the idea of "separate but equal" constitutional. This concept is related to the legal principle of racial segregation in the United States, which was upheld by the Supreme Court in the case of Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />The Supreme Court's decision in Plessy v. Ferguson was based on the interpretation of the 14th Amendment, which guarantees equal protection under the law. The Court held that as long as the separate facilities provided for each race were equal, segregation did not violate the 14th Amendment.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />The Court's reasoning was that separate spaces could be of the same quality, and therefore, a separation did not violate the equal protection requirements of the 14th Amendment. This is the basis for the "separate but equal" doctrine.
Clique para avaliar: