What difference is there between Carmichael's perspective conveyed in "An Old Bush Road" and Johnson's perspective conveyed in "Joe"? Carmichael was directly inspired by Australia's complex colonia history, while Johnson was inspired by her dual indigenous and Canadian heritage. Carmichael expressed disappointment in nature's ability to fight back against the changes being made to it from colonization, while celebrated nature's resiliency. Carmichael was directly inspired by her dual indigenous and Australian heritage, while Johnson was directly inspired by Canada's complex colonial history. Carmichael was the descendent of a wealthy business family, so she could understand why industries needed to expand, while Johnson came from a poor family that lived on a farm.

The difference between Carmichael's perspective in "An Old Bush Road" and Johnson's perspective in "Joe" can be understood through their backgrounds and inspirations. <br /><br />Carmichael was directly inspired by Australia's complex colonial history, which often reflects themes of colonization and its impact on nature. Her work might express disappointment in how nature is affected by these changes.<br /><br />On the other hand, Johnson, with her dual indigenous and Canadian heritage, might celebrate nature's resiliency, drawing from her background to highlight the strength and endurance of natural landscapes despite human interference.<br /><br />Therefore, the most fitting distinction would be: <br />Carmichael expressed disappointment in nature's ability to fight back against the changes being made to it from colonization, while Johnson celebrated nature's resiliency.